Arizona Employers' Liability Cases
| Arizona Employers' Liability Cases | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided June 9, 1919 | |
| Full case name | Arizona Copper Company, Limited, v. Hammer; Arizona Copper Company, Limited, v. Bray; Ray Consolidated Copper Company v. Veazey; Inspiration Consolidated Copper Company v. Mendez; Superior & Pittsburg Copper Company v. Tomich, sometimes known as Thomas |
| Citations | 250 U.S. 400 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Worker's compensation laws do not violate the employer's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Pitney |
| Concurrence | Holmes, joined by Brandeis, Clark |
| Dissent | McKenna, joined by White, Van Devanter, McReynolds |
| Dissent | McReynolds, joined by White, McKenna, Van Devanter |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
Arizona Employers' Liability Cases, 250 U.S. 400 (1919), was a collection of United States Supreme Court companion cases in which the court held that workers' compensation laws do not violate the employer's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.[1][2]
