Cheff v. Schnackenberg
| Cheff v. Schnackenberg | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Argued March 3, 1966 Decided June 6, 1966 | |
| Full case name | Cheff v. Schnackenberg, U.S. Circuit Judge, et al. |
| Citations | 384 U.S. 373 (more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Plurality | Clark, joined by Warren, Brennan, Fortas |
| Concurrence | Harlan (in result), joined by Stewart (Part I) |
| Dissent | Douglas, joined by Black |
| White took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 (1966), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that crimes carrying possible penalties up to six months imprisonment do not require a jury trial if they otherwise qualify as petty offenses.[1][2]
References
External links
- Text of Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 (1966) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
