Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski
| Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Argued February 28, 2024 Decided May 23, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski |
| Docket no. | 23-3 |
| Citations | 602 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Holding | |
| Where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Jackson, joined by unanimous |
| Concur/dissent | Gorsuch |
Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs.[1][2]
