In mathematics, the Kodaira–Spencer map, introduced by Kunihiko Kodaira and Donald C. Spencer, is a map associated to a deformation of a scheme or complex manifold X, taking a tangent space of a point of the deformation space to the first cohomology group of the sheaf of vector fields on X.
Definition
Historical motivation
The Kodaira–Spencer map was originally constructed in the setting of complex manifolds. Given a complex analytic manifold  with charts
 with charts  and biholomorphic maps
 and biholomorphic maps  sending
 sending  gluing the charts together, the idea of deformation theory is to replace these transition maps
 gluing the charts together, the idea of deformation theory is to replace these transition maps  by parametrized transition maps
 by parametrized transition maps  over some base
 over some base  (which could be a real manifold) with coordinates
 (which could be a real manifold) with coordinates  , such that
, such that  . This means the parameters
. This means the parameters  deform the complex structure of the original complex manifold
 deform the complex structure of the original complex manifold  . Then, these functions must also satisfy a cocycle condition, which gives a 1-cocycle on
. Then, these functions must also satisfy a cocycle condition, which gives a 1-cocycle on  with values in its tangent bundle. Since the base can be assumed to be a polydisk, this process gives a map between the tangent space of the base to
 with values in its tangent bundle. Since the base can be assumed to be a polydisk, this process gives a map between the tangent space of the base to  called the Kodaira–Spencer map.[1]
 called the Kodaira–Spencer map.[1]
Original definition
More formally, the Kodaira–Spencer map is[2]
 
where
 is a smooth proper map between complex spaces[3] (i.e., a deformation of the special fiber is a smooth proper map between complex spaces[3] (i.e., a deformation of the special fiber .) .)
 is the connecting homomorphism obtained by taking a long exact cohomology sequence of the surjection is the connecting homomorphism obtained by taking a long exact cohomology sequence of the surjection whose kernel is the tangent bundle whose kernel is the tangent bundle . .
If  is in
 is in  , then its image
, then its image  is called the Kodaira–Spencer class of
 is called the Kodaira–Spencer class of  .
.
Because deformation theory has been extended to multiple other contexts, such as deformations in scheme theory, or ringed topoi, there are constructions of the Kodaira–Spencer map for these contexts.
In the scheme theory over a base field  of characteristic
 of characteristic  , there is a natural bijection between isomorphisms classes of
, there is a natural bijection between isomorphisms classes of ![{\displaystyle {\mathcal {X}}\to S=\operatorname {Spec} (k[t]/t^{2})}](./_assets_/c30475ba09bd358c8f59805d8ddfd96da18b64d1.svg) and
 and  .
.
Constructions
Using infinitesimals
Over characteristic  the construction of the Kodaira–Spencer map[4] can be done using an infinitesimal interpretation of the cocycle condition. If we have a complex manifold
 the construction of the Kodaira–Spencer map[4] can be done using an infinitesimal interpretation of the cocycle condition. If we have a complex manifold  covered by finitely many charts
 covered by finitely many charts  with coordinates
 with coordinates  and transition functions
 and transition functions 
 where
 where 
Recall that a deformation is given by a commutative diagram
![{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}X&\to &{\mathfrak {X}}\\\downarrow &&\downarrow \\{\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {C} )&\to &{\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {C} [\varepsilon ])\end{matrix}}}](./_assets_/a9e30505f5d9f07a6c2fba43cfc69da1533de3d2.svg)
where ![{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} [\varepsilon ]}](./_assets_/34804818afb815199af6ef94b76ee23cf08ee284.svg) is the ring of dual numbers and the vertical maps are flat, the deformation has the cohomological interpretation as cocycles
 is the ring of dual numbers and the vertical maps are flat, the deformation has the cohomological interpretation as cocycles  on
 on ![{\displaystyle U_{\alpha }\times {\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {C} [\varepsilon ])}](./_assets_/e5b57f4615e5dc110045c96f53f5f5d4d121a50c.svg) where
 where

If the  satisfy the cocycle condition, then they glue to the deformation
 satisfy the cocycle condition, then they glue to the deformation  . This can be read as
. This can be read as

Using the properties of the dual numbers, namely  , we have
, we have

and

hence the cocycle condition on ![{\displaystyle U_{\alpha }\times {\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {C} [\varepsilon ])}](./_assets_/e5b57f4615e5dc110045c96f53f5f5d4d121a50c.svg) is the following two rules
 is the following two rules
 
 
Conversion to cocycles of vector fields
The cocycle of the deformation can easily be converted to a cocycle of vector fields  as follows: given the cocycle
 as follows: given the cocycle  we can form the vector field
 we can form the vector field

which is a 1-cochain. Then the rule for the transition maps of  gives this 1-cochain as a 1-cocycle, hence a class
 gives this 1-cochain as a 1-cocycle, hence a class ![{\displaystyle [\theta ]\in H^{1}(X,T_{X})}](./_assets_/7ded99a5758f4092daa2a210c878e811224486c7.svg) .
.
Using vector fields
One of the original constructions of this map used vector fields in the settings of differential geometry and complex analysis.[1] Given the notation above, the transition from a deformation to the cocycle condition is transparent over a small base of dimension one, so there is only one parameter  . Then, the cocycle condition can be read as
. Then, the cocycle condition can be read as

Then, the derivative of  with respect to
 with respect to  can be calculated from the previous equation as
 can be calculated from the previous equation as

Note because  and
 and  , then the derivative reads as
, then the derivative reads as 

With a change of coordinates of the part of the previous holomorphic vector field having these partial derivatives as the coefficients, we can write

Hence we can write up the equation above as the following equation of vector fields

Rewriting this as the vector fields

where

gives the cocycle condition. Hence  has an associated class in
 has an associated class in ![{\displaystyle [\theta _{ij}]\in H^{1}(M,T_{M})}](./_assets_/2bd270bfe0b2dd7f1dbbed7807613e0ebc6a0cbe.svg) from the original deformation
 from the original deformation  of
 of  .
.
In scheme theory
Deformations of a smooth variety[5]
![{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}X&\to &{\mathfrak {X}}\\\downarrow &&\downarrow \\{\text{Spec}}(k)&\to &{\text{Spec}}(k[\varepsilon ])\end{matrix}}}](./_assets_/1187fa90674efb7b13b591e3ea76e9550e7d6576.svg)
have a Kodaira-Spencer class constructed cohomologically. Associated to this deformation is the short exact sequence
![{\displaystyle 0\to \pi ^{*}\Omega _{{\text{Spec}}(k[\varepsilon ])}^{1}\to \Omega _{\mathfrak {X}}^{1}\to \Omega _{{\mathfrak {X}}/S}^{1}\to 0}](./_assets_/2fb8f33b5ec1b81fb489a005aa9ab3cafa5b1e0b.svg)
(where ![{\displaystyle \pi :{\mathfrak {X}}\to S={\text{Spec}}(k[\varepsilon ])}](./_assets_/1a790c2eeb83641ac6dfa6fbba66f1286bcb81c0.svg) ) which when tensored by the
) which when tensored by the  -module
-module  gives the short exact sequence
 gives the short exact sequence

Using derived categories, this defines an element in
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\mathbf {R} {\text{Hom}}(\Omega _{X}^{1},{\mathcal {O}}_{X}[+1])&\cong \mathbf {R} {\text{Hom}}({\mathcal {O}}_{X},T_{X}[+1])\\&\cong {\text{Ext}}^{1}({\mathcal {O}}_{X},T_{X})\\&\cong H^{1}(X,T_{X})\end{aligned}}}](./_assets_/76f7c4e4ff752ae431f69a6a305c07d75bc69917.svg)
generalizing the Kodaira–Spencer map. Notice this could be generalized to any smooth map  in
 in  using the cotangent sequence, giving an element in
 using the cotangent sequence, giving an element in  .
.
Of ringed topoi
One of the most abstract constructions of the Kodaira–Spencer maps comes from the cotangent complexes associated to a composition of maps of ringed topoi

Then, associated to this composition is a distinguished triangle
![{\displaystyle f^{*}\mathbf {L} _{Y/Z}\to \mathbf {L} _{X/Z}\to \mathbf {L} _{X/Y}\xrightarrow {[+1]} }](./_assets_/db96dd778212c872d7cd3a34be5b271ea696d9c5.svg)
and this boundary map forms the Kodaira–Spencer map[6] (or cohomology class, denoted  ). If the two maps in the composition are smooth maps of schemes, then this class coincides with the class in
). If the two maps in the composition are smooth maps of schemes, then this class coincides with the class in  .
.
Examples
With analytic germs
The Kodaira–Spencer map when considering analytic germs is easily computable using the tangent cohomology in deformation theory and its versal deformations.[7] For example, given the germ of a polynomial  , its space of deformations can be given by the module
, its space of deformations can be given by the module

For example, if  then its versal deformations is given by
 then its versal deformations is given by

hence an arbitrary deformation is given by  . Then for a vector
. Then for a vector  , which has the basis
, which has the basis

there the map  sending
 sending

On affine hypersurfaces with the cotangent complex
For an affine hypersurface  over a field
 over a field  defined by a polynomial
 defined by a polynomial  , there is the associated fundamental triangle
, there is the associated fundamental triangle
![{\displaystyle i^{*}\mathbf {L} _{\mathbb {A} ^{n}/{\text{Spec}}(k)}\to \mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/{\text{Spec}}(k)}\to \mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/\mathbb {A} ^{n}}\xrightarrow {[+1]} }](./_assets_/5ca3e85f5526fce3e3ac17aa1dfcb0a0faa58ce8.svg)
Then, applying  gives the long exact sequence
 gives the long exact sequence
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\textbf {RHom}}(i^{*}\mathbf {L} _{\mathbb {A} ^{n}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])\leftarrow {\textbf {RHom}}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])\leftarrow {\textbf {RHom}}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/\mathbb {A} ^{n}},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])\\\leftarrow &{\textbf {RHom}}(i^{*}\mathbf {L} _{\mathbb {A} ^{n}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\leftarrow {\textbf {RHom}}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\leftarrow {\textbf {RHom}}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/\mathbb {A} ^{n}},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\end{aligned}}}](./_assets_/007307d8ab00c6056eb3b858dcf0dd8842655aa7.svg)
Recall that there is the isomorphism
![{\displaystyle {\textbf {RHom}}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])\cong {\text{Ext}}^{1}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})}](./_assets_/cb79f0717ae6ff55e7a3301d375da8519d786502.svg)
from general theory of derived categories, and the ext group classifies the first-order deformations. Then, through a series of reductions, this group can be computed. First, since  is a free module,
 is a free module, ![{\displaystyle {\textbf {RHom}}(i^{*}\mathbf {L} _{\mathbb {A} ^{n}/{\text{Spec}}(k)},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])=0}](./_assets_/326577be3d2b4cdf3d02d3e7d029a35e10c18c27.svg) . Also, because
. Also, because ![{\displaystyle \mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/\mathbb {A} ^{n}}\cong {\mathcal {I}}/{\mathcal {I}}^{2}[+1]}](./_assets_/a046e040a442362171f9e935f495b3f3ef59d620.svg) , there are isomorphisms
, there are isomorphisms
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\textbf {RHom}}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/\mathbb {A} ^{n}},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])\cong &{\textbf {RHom}}({\mathcal {I}}/{\mathcal {I}}^{2}[+1],{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}[+1])\\\cong &{\textbf {RHom}}({\mathcal {I}}/{\mathcal {I}}^{2},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\\\cong &{\text{Ext}}^{0}({\mathcal {I}}/{\mathcal {I}}^{2},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\\\cong &{\text{Hom}}({\mathcal {I}}/{\mathcal {I}}^{2},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\\\cong &{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}\end{aligned}}}](./_assets_/b4341124a6873fd252efe0d2bf6df3bead730874.svg)
The last isomorphism comes from the isomorphism  , and a morphism in
, and a morphism in
 send
  send ![{\displaystyle [gf]\mapsto g'g+(f)}](./_assets_/c49f01a5aedd883f7d82ad2215118addebb5eefb.svg)
giving the desired isomorphism. From the cotangent sequence
![{\displaystyle {\frac {(f)}{(f)^{2}}}\xrightarrow {[g]\mapsto dg\otimes 1} \Omega _{\mathbb {A} ^{n}}^{1}\otimes {\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}}\to \Omega _{X_{0}/{\text{Spec}}(k)}^{1}\to 0}](./_assets_/0e3c0293fef716bfdd4e6966326e285eadf4d14e.svg)
(which is a truncated version of the fundamental triangle) the connecting map of the long exact sequence is the dual of ![{\displaystyle [g]\mapsto dg\otimes 1}](./_assets_/ba83ee8833e47d537d7f219fa9628391addd6129.svg) , giving the isomorphism
, giving the isomorphism
![{\displaystyle {\text{Ext}}^{1}(\mathbf {L} _{X_{0}/k},{\mathcal {O}}_{X_{0}})\cong {\frac {k[x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n}]}{\left(f,{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x_{1}}},\ldots ,{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x_{n}}}\right)}}}](./_assets_/d5265002fa428a4d86ad340846ec413d36064ae6.svg)
Note this computation can be done by using the cotangent sequence and computing  .[8] Then, the Kodaira–Spencer map sends a deformation
.[8] Then, the Kodaira–Spencer map sends a deformation
![{\displaystyle {\frac {k[\varepsilon ][x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n}]}{f+\varepsilon g}}}](./_assets_/5cf2364ffcec9450d453c25c7c60a7e3c08ad1e0.svg)
to the element  .
.
See also
References
- ^ a b Kodaira (2005). Complex Manifolds and Deformation of Complex Structures. Classics in Mathematics. pp. 182–184, 188–189. doi:10.1007/b138372. ISBN 978-3-540-22614-7.
- ^ Huybrechts 2005, 6.2.6.
- ^ The main difference between a complex manifold and a complex space is that the latter is allowed to have a nilpotent.
- ^ Arbarello; Cornalba; Griffiths (2011). Geometry of Algebraic Curves II. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Arbarello, E. Et al: Algebraic Curves I, II. Springer. pp. 172–174. ISBN 9783540426882.
- ^ Sernesi. "An overview of classical deformation theory" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-04-27.
- ^ Illusie, L. Complexe cotangent ; application a la theorie des deformations (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-11-25. Retrieved 2020-04-27.
- ^ Palamodov (1990). "Deformations of Complex Spaces". Several Complex Variables IV. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 10. pp. 138, 130. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61263-3_3. ISBN 978-3-642-64766-6.
- ^ Talpo, Mattia; Vistoli, Angelo (2011-01-30). "Deformation theory from the point of view of fibered categories". pp. 25, exercise 3.25. arXiv:1006.0497 [math.AG].