In mathematics, the Whitney inequality gives an upper bound for the error of best approximation of a function by polynomials in terms of the moduli of smoothness. It was first proved by Hassler Whitney in 1957,[1] and is an important tool in the field of approximation theory for obtaining upper estimates on the errors of best approximation.
Statement of the theorem
Denote the value of the best uniform approximation of a function ![{\displaystyle f\in C([a,b])}](./_assets_/e35a84e8df64b276d8617c4ce40b9a2dd5bfe6a5.svg) by algebraic polynomials
 by algebraic polynomials  of degree
 of degree  by
 by
![{\displaystyle E_{n}(f)_{[a,b]}:=\inf _{P_{n}}{\|f-P_{n}\|_{C([a,b])}}}](./_assets_/fa8cc4172ca00865bb83151b025c1ec5e4342c22.svg) 
The moduli of smoothness of order  of a function
 of a function ![{\displaystyle f\in C([a,b])}](./_assets_/e35a84e8df64b276d8617c4ce40b9a2dd5bfe6a5.svg) are defined as:
 are defined as:
![{\displaystyle \omega _{k}(t):=\omega _{k}(t;f;[a,b]):=\sup _{h\in [0,t]}\|\Delta _{h}^{k}(f;\cdot )\|_{C([a,b-kh])}\quad {\text{ for }}\quad t\in [0,(b-a)/k],}](./_assets_/b828aed15d7487df9d4324ad041c8d4d611a65f9.svg) 
 
where  is the finite difference of order
 is the finite difference of order  .
.
Theorem: [2] [Whitney, 1957] If ![{\displaystyle f\in C([a,b])}](./_assets_/e35a84e8df64b276d8617c4ce40b9a2dd5bfe6a5.svg) , then
, then
![{\displaystyle E_{k-1}(f)_{[a,b]}\leq W_{k}\omega _{k}\left({\frac {b-a}{k}};f;[a,b]\right)}](./_assets_/2ca3b957cd4c2f0a2dcb9a2998810dbba34d5485.svg) 
where  is a constant depending only on
 is a constant depending only on  . The Whitney constant
. The Whitney constant  is the smallest value of
 is the smallest value of  for which the above inequality holds. The theorem is particularly useful when applied on intervals of small length, leading to good estimates on the error of spline approximation.
 for which the above inequality holds. The theorem is particularly useful when applied on intervals of small length, leading to good estimates on the error of spline approximation.
Proof
The original proof given by Whitney follows an analytic argument which utilizes the properties of moduli of smoothness. However, it can also be proved in a much shorter way using Peetre's K-functionals.[3]
Let:
 
 
![{\displaystyle \omega _{k}(t):=\omega _{k}(t;f;[a,b])\equiv \omega _{k}(t;g;[a,b])}](./_assets_/1c87ca1c9713cc99c037fc8a33317d529e9cdea9.svg) 
where  is the Lagrange polynomial for
 is the Lagrange polynomial for  at the nodes
 at the nodes  .
.
Now fix some ![{\displaystyle x\in [a,b]}](./_assets_/026357b404ee584c475579fb2302a4e9881b8cce.svg) and choose
 and choose  for which
 for which ![{\displaystyle (x+k\delta )\in [a,b]}](./_assets_/81586606177a4068b16b5e6254c87287ef7f33be.svg) . Then:
. Then:
 
 
Therefore:
![{\displaystyle |g(x)|\leq \int _{0}^{1}|\Delta _{t\delta }^{k}(g;x)|\,dt+{\frac {2}{|\delta |}}\|G\|_{C([a,b])}\sum _{j=1}^{k}{\binom {k}{j}}{\frac {1}{j}}\leq \omega _{k}(|\delta |)+{\frac {1}{|\delta |}}2^{k+1}\|G\|_{C([a,b])}}](./_assets_/c7b81e9c2c9af5ff8eb2121948020ea247c35eec.svg) 
And since we have ![{\displaystyle \|G\|_{C([a,b])}\leq h\omega _{k}(h)}](./_assets_/ee76b7f9a0453032ff60bb77064c4883f73954a9.svg) , (a property of moduli of smoothness)
, (a property of moduli of smoothness)
![{\displaystyle E_{k-1}(f)_{[a,b]}\leq \|g\|_{C([a,b])}\leq \omega _{k}(|\delta |)+{\frac {1}{|\delta |}}h2^{k+1}\omega _{k}(h).}](./_assets_/32435907192bd36e56d35b0c92e50f703c25cca3.svg) 
Since  can always be chosen in such a way that
 can always be chosen in such a way that  , this completes the proof.
, this completes the proof.
Whitney constants and Sendov's conjecture
It is important to have sharp estimates of the Whitney constants. It is easily shown that  , and it was first proved by Burkill (1952) that
, and it was first proved by Burkill (1952) that  , who conjectured that
, who conjectured that  for all
 for all  . Whitney was also able to prove that [2]
. Whitney was also able to prove that [2]
 
and
 
In 1964, Brudnyi was able to obtain the estimate  , and in 1982, Sendov proved that
, and in 1982, Sendov proved that  .  Then, in 1985, Ivanov and Takev proved that
.  Then, in 1985, Ivanov and Takev proved that  , and Binev proved that
, and Binev proved that  . Sendov conjectured that
. Sendov conjectured that  for all
 for all  , and in 1985 was able to prove that the Whitney constants are bounded above by an absolute constant, that is,
, and in 1985 was able to prove that the Whitney constants are bounded above by an absolute constant, that is,  for all
 for all  . Kryakin, Gilewicz, and Shevchuk (2002)[4] were able to show that
. Kryakin, Gilewicz, and Shevchuk (2002)[4] were able to show that  for
 for  , and that
, and that  for all
 for all  .
.
References
- ^ Hassler, Whitney (1957). "On Functions with Bounded nth Differences". J. Math. Pures Appl. 36 (IX): 67–95.
 — (1992). "On functions with bounded nth differences". In Eells, J.; Toledo, D. (eds.). Hassler Whitney Collected Papers. Contemporary Mathematicians. Birkhäuser Boston. pp. 407–435. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2972-8_28. ISBN 978-1-4612-2972-8.
- ^ a b Dzyadyk, Vladislav K.; Shevchuk, Igor A. (2008). "3. On smoothness of functions §3.6". Theory of Uniform Approximation of Functions by Polynomials. de Gruyter. pp. 231–3. doi:10.1515/9783110208245.167. ISBN 978-3-11-020147-5. OCLC 560639251.
- ^ Devore, R.A.K.; Lorentz, G.G. (2010) [1993]. "6. K-Functionals and Interpolation Spaces §4 Two Theorems of Whitney: Theorem 4.2". Constructive Approximation. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 303. Springer. pp. 183–. ISBN 978-3-642-08075-3. OCLC 1058163028.
- ^ Gilewicz, J.; Kryakin, Yu. V.; Shevchuk, I. A. (2002). "Boundedness by 3 of the Whitney Interpolation Constant". Journal of Approximation Theory. 119 (2): 271–290. doi:10.1006/jath.2002.3732.